A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and implement Section 302, emphasizing the importance of a fair and just legal system. It can be very important for society to understand the gravity of this offense and the need for stringent punishment to prevent potential offenders and make certain justice to the victims and their family members.
These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, advertising a more informed and just society.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal advice or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed to your court in which the case has actually been or will be filed.
These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to this kind of past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, it is also a nicely-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.
be founded without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is a horrifying reality, a very very low threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
Extra username and password are necessary for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more
When the petitioner is actually present on the place of occurrence without causing any injury to the deceased or PWs then in these types of circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided because of the uncovered trial Court after recording in the evidence.
So, it was held that the right to the healthy environment was part of your fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article nine and 14 on the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all aspects of human existence, all these kinds of amenities and amenities that a person is entitled to take pleasure in with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
Generally speaking, higher courts never have direct oversight over the reduce courts of record, in that they cannot achieve out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments from the decreased courts.
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is nicely set up now that the provision for proforma promotion is not alien or unfamiliar to the civil servant service structure but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it really is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority could if pleased that a civil servant who was entitled to generally be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his possess, wrongfully prevented from rendering service for the Federation/ province in the higher post, direct that such civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay back and allowances of these higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation case law on hostile witness arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Pakistan’s legal system isn't without flaws: overhauling is overdue as well as the law regarding murder demands critical reconsideration and clarification. For your time being, the least that can be done is to make sure that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.